Operation Branchform timeline: the full SNP money story
Use this Operation Branchform timeline to follow every major event from the SNP fundraisers to Peter Murrell's . Nicola Sturgeon and Colin Beattie were not .
By Graeme · 2 August 2026 · 26 min read

On this page
Peter Murrell stole £400,310.65 from the Scottish National Party. Nicola Sturgeon and Colin Beattie were investigated but not . This Operation Branchform timeline is the complete, source-linked story of how questions about referendum donations became a court case — and what remains unfinished.
Living timeline
Last independently checked: 2 August 2026
The event date and the date a fact became known are not always the same. Purchases from 2010 onward are marked “Established in court” because the public learned the proved detail only in 2026.
The whole story in one minute
Supporters gave the SNP money in appeals for another independence referendum. The party first described the receipts as , then explained that the money was pooled with its normal cash and tracked as an internal . Concern about that gap between ordinary expectations and the accounting treatment led to police complaints in 2021.
The investigation then uncovered something more direct and much older: chief executive Peter Murrell had been using money from the party's main bank account without authority since 2010. He concealed personal spending through false invoices, misleading account codes and expense claims. In 2026 he admitted one charge of .
That does not make the appeal total and the stolen total interchangeable. said the main account contained money principally from membership fees, donations and legacies. The agreed court record does not say which individual stolen pounds came from the referendum appeals.
Peter Murrell
Admitted embezzling £400,310.65 from the SNP between August 2010 and October 2022. Sentenced to five years and three months.
Nicola Sturgeon
Not
in 2023, but no longer under investigation in Operation Branchform since 20 March 2025. A separate 2026 complaint has not publicly named her as a suspect.
Colin Beattie
Not
in 2023, then released without charge. Police ended their investigation of him on 20 March 2025.
The SNP
Victim organisation
The party was the organisation Murrell stole from; it was not prosecuted. An Electoral Commission review of past filings remains separate and was still open at the last update.
Why this is not called “Sturgeon stole the money”
No court found that Nicola Sturgeon stole money, and did not charge her. Senior Scottish decided that no charge or further inquiry was required; a second, independent senior lawyer reached the same conclusion. Her name belongs in the story because she led the party, was married to Murrell at the time, made public statements about the finances and was before being cleared — not because guilt can be transferred from one person to another.
Three money figures people often mix up
Much of the confusion disappears when three different figures are kept apart.
£666,953
Raised by independence appeals through 2020
The SNP's own 2020 accounts said £51,760 had been applied and the rest was internally . This was a party statement in a regulated filing.
£400,310.65
by Murrell
This is the final court-proved amount taken from the party's principal account over more than 12 years.
£2,248,353
Public grants for party policy research, 2010–22
These grants are public money paid to parties for policy research and development; they are separate from referendum donations. The Electoral Commission said its annual checks found no evidence they were misused. It is separately reviewing past party filings after the .
“Ring-fenced” did not mean a separate bank account
In 2017 the SNP publicly said appeal money was . In October 2020, treasurer Colin Beattie said £593,501 could be deployed “instantaneously”, even though it was woven through the party's general income. The 2020 accounts later said there was no separate fund: donor wishes were recorded internally and the would be met from .
Everyday translation
The original cash was mixed with the party's other money. The SNP kept an internal tally of what supporters wanted it used for and said it would spend an equivalent amount on independence work later. That can produce an promise larger than the cash physically in the bank. It also explains why donors questioned whether “” was the right ordinary-language description.
The full timeline
This chronology runs from Murrell taking control of the party administration to the latest live inquiries. It includes political context only where it explains why money was raised, why the promised campaign did not happen, or why a public mattered.
Use the labels as an evidence key. “Established in court” is admitted fact. “Officially confirmed” is a police, court, , government or filed-account record. “Reported at the time” is attributed contemporary reporting. “ at that stage” was not yet proved. “Context” must not be treated as evidence of guilt.
Choose how much to see
The complete timeline
“Show everything” is the full story. The filters only make it easier to revisit one part; they do not change the evidence.
Showing 76 events.
2001–2016 · control and what court later proved
Established in court Murrell is the SNP's chief executive
Peter Murrell became the SNP's chief executive in 2001. The agreed court narrative says he was effectively the party's administrative head and had substantial control over its principal bank account, staff cards, invoices and accounting information.
In everyday language: This position of trust is why the offence was : he was authorised to handle party money, but not to use it for himself.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court The begins
Murrell later admitted that his unauthorised use of SNP money began in August 2010. He used direct bank transfers, his own party card and cards assigned to two unsuspecting staff members, then disguised spending with misleading descriptions and account codes.
In everyday language: The public did not know this in 2010. It became an established fact only when Murrell pleaded guilty in 2026.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed Scotland votes No in the independence referendum
The final result was 55.25% No and 44.65% Yes. That vote is the political starting point for the later appeals asking supporters to fund a campaign for another referendum.
Source
- Report on the Scottish independence referendum — Electoral Commission
Established in court £16,489 of party money goes towards a Volkswagen Golf
The SNP transferred £16,489 towards a Volkswagen Golf that became Murrell's personal car. The agreed narrative treats that payment as part of the total.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed Scotland votes Remain while the UK votes to leave the EU
The next morning Sturgeon said a second independence referendum had to be considered. That political change led directly to the referendum proposal and appeal launched the following March.
Source
- First Minister's response to the EU referendum result — Scottish Government
2017–2020 · appeals, spending and questions
Reported at the time The SNP launches an independence appeal
After Nicola Sturgeon announced plans to seek authority for another independence referendum, the SNP launched an online appeal with a £1 million target. Donors were told the money would support the referendum campaign.
Sources
- First Minister's Bute House speech — Scottish Government
- SNP shuts down online fundraising drive for indyref2 — STV News archive
Officially confirmed Holyrood votes to seek referendum powers
MSPs voted 69–59 to authorise Sturgeon to request a from the UK Government. The order would have transferred legal power to hold another referendum.
Source
- Meeting of the Parliament — 28 March 2017 — Scottish Parliament
Reported at the time The public page shows almost £482,000, then disappears
STV recorded a total of almost £482,000 on 8 June. By the next morning the fundraising page had been removed. The SNP said it had always planned a short campaign and that the money remained available for a future referendum.
In everyday language: That public total was not the later court-proved theft figure. The two numbers describe different things and cannot simply be subtracted from each other.
Source
- SNP shuts down online fundraising drive for indyref2 — STV News archive
Established in court Two watches are bought and coded as event merchandise
Murrell used party money to buy watches costing £4,555.25 and £4,795. The payments were coded as event merchandise. Police later recovered the watches from SNP headquarters.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Reported at the time The SNP says the appeal money is
Responding to questions after the page closed, the party said the money was for the stated referendum purpose and had not been used for the general election.
In everyday language: The original appeal did not promise a legally separate bank account. But '' commonly sounds stronger than the internal earmark and future- treatment described later.
Sources
- SNP shuts down online fundraising drive for indyref2 — STV News archive
- What is the latest in the SNP finance probe? — STV News
Officially confirmed Sturgeon delays the immediate referendum timetable
After the SNP lost 21 Westminster seats, Sturgeon said the plan would pause until the terms of Brexit were clearer. This helps explain why the appeal money was not immediately deployed.
Source
- EU negotiations and Scotland's future — Scottish Government
Established in court A £332 watch roll is hidden in other expense codes
A Smythson watch roll was paid for with party money and described in the records as hotel and staff expenditure. It formed part of the offending admitted in court.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed The first post-appeal annual accounts show £7,906 cash
The SNP's 2017 accounts reported £5.80 million income, £5.10 million expenditure, £7,906 cash and £528,276 . They did not itemise the appeal as a separate fund.
In everyday language: Low cash raised a reasonable question, but it did not by itself prove misuse: annual accounts include assets, and internal commitments, not only bank balances.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2017 — Electoral Commission
Established in court False expense claims move £18,408.91 to Murrell
Murrell submitted false expense claims totalling £18,408.91. The court narrative also describes false supporting invoices, including one made to look like a £12,042 Apple invoice and another for £2,478 from Manufactum.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Reported at the time A second independence fundraiser begins
The SNP launched another appeal after Sturgeon set out a route towards a possible referendum. The party said donations would help send an independence guide to 2.46 million Scottish households.
Source
- SNP launch major independence fundraising drive — The Press and Journal
Officially confirmed The 2018 accounts report £411,042 cash
The next annual filing showed £411,042 cash and £591,077 . The referendum appeal still did not appear as its own bank account or line item.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2018 — Electoral Commission
Established in court A £30 parking ticket is paid with the party card
Murrell used an SNP card for his own parking penalty. The amount was small, but the court included it as another unauthorised use of party money.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court £57,500 of SNP money helps buy a Jaguar i-Pace
Two SNP transfers totalling £57,500 were used towards a Jaguar i-Pace costing £81,277. A false invoice made the payments look connected to event staging. The car was for Murrell's personal use.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court Hundreds of online purchases are delivered to Murrell's home
The court record lists 383 Amazon purchases costing £42,660.74. From April 2020, almost all were delivered to Murrell's home. Another 238 purchases from other retailers between 2015 and 2022 totalled £139,971.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court An egg poacher is recorded as computer hardware
A £23.98 egg poacher was bought with party money and coded as computer hardware and an Ethernet connection. It is a small purchase, but a clear example of how descriptions were changed to conceal personal spending.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed The 2019 accounts show cash falling to £96,854
Cash fell from £411,042 to £96,854 and were £271,916. Because the appeal money was not shown separately, the filing intensified public questions about how the to donors was being accounted for.
In everyday language: A cash balance below the publicly discussed appeal total was not proof that £600,000 had been stolen or lost.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2019 — Electoral Commission
Established in court Murrell orders a £124,550 motorhome
A £12,500 deposit was placed on an unbranded motorhome. On 7 December, four transfers from the SNP's account paid the remaining £112,050. A false invoice described a different type of vehicle.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Reported at the time Treasurer Beattie says £593,501 can be deployed instantly
Beattie said the referendum appeal balance was woven through the party's overall income rather than shown separately, but could be deployed instantaneously for a referendum campaign.
In everyday language: That description and the later future- explanation are materially different. This timeline presents both and leaves readers to judge whether the wording met donor expectations.
Sources
- SNP responds to questions over independence appeal money — The National
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2020 — Electoral Commission
Officially confirmed The party accounts say £666,953 was raised for independence work
The SNP's 2020 accounts said appeals from 2017 to 2020 raised £666,953 and £51,760 had been applied. They said the remainder was internally , not kept in a separate bank account, and was managed through normal .
In everyday language: This is what the party stated in a regulated filing. The Electoral Commission's publication of an account is not a guarantee that every statement inside it was independently proved.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2020 — Electoral Commission
2021–2022 · complaints become an investigation
Established in court The motorhome is taken to Murrell's mother's home
The motorhome was delivered at Halbeath and driven to Murrell's mother's driveway in Dunfermline. Other party staff did not use or see it. When police seized it in 2023, it had four miles on the odometer and contained no campaign material.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Reported at the time Three finance and audit committee members resign
Frank Ross, Cynthia Guthrie and Allison Graham said delay and inadequate financial information prevented them carrying out their duties. Their resignations were put before the SNP national executive the next day.
In everyday language: Their stated concern was that they could not scrutinise the finances properly. A resignation is not, by itself, proof that a crime occurred.
Source
Reported at the time Sturgeon tells the party executive its finances are strong
At the same national executive meeting, Sturgeon said the party had never been in a stronger financial position and cautioned members against suggesting there were financial problems. A recording became public in April 2023.
In everyday language: The words are documented. They are not evidence that Sturgeon knew about Murrell's , and later decided she should not be or investigated further.
Sources
- Leaked video shows Sturgeon dismissing concerns over SNP finances — STV News
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
at that stage Police receive the first complaint about independence donations
A complaint alleged possible mishandling of the money raised for another referendum. More complaints followed. Police first assessed the allegations before opening a formal investigation in July.
In everyday language: A complaint is a request to investigate, not a finding. later said that this wider inquiry uncovered Murrell's separate course of .
Sources
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- Operation Branchform: key dates in the SNP finance investigation — STV News
Reported at the time National treasurer Douglas Chapman resigns
Chapman said he had not received the support or financial information required to carry out his . Colin Beattie returned as national treasurer the following month.
Sources
- SNP finance boss quits over lack of information — STV News
- Douglas Chapman quits as SNP treasurer amid transparency concerns — The Press and Journal
Established in court Murrell sells a party iPad and keeps £701
Murrell sold an SNP iPad and arranged for the proceeds to be paid into his personal bank account. The transaction formed part of the admitted in court.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed Murrell lends the SNP £107,620
Murrell made an interest-free loan to help the party's after the Holyrood election. The party repaid £26,905 in August and £20,715 in October, leaving £60,000 outstanding.
In everyday language: The loan was not the theft. It was real money advanced to the party, but the lender-specific regulatory report was submitted late.
Sources
- Loan record AL0559123 — Electoral Commission
- FOI 002-23 — report of SNP loan — Electoral Commission
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2021 — Electoral Commission
Officially confirmed Police open the formal investigation later called Operation Branchform
After receiving seven complaints and consulting , Police Scotland opened a formal investigation into the SNP's funding and finances.
Sources
- Operation Branchform: key dates in the SNP finance investigation — STV News
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court Murrell sells the Jaguar and keeps £47,378.76
The proceeds from selling the Jaguar i-Pace were paid into Murrell's personal account. The vehicle had been partly bought with SNP money and was not a party asset.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed The next accounts show a £487,487 internal independence earmark
The SNP later reported £740,822 of appeal income and £253,335 of spending, leaving £487,487 internally . Year-end cash was £144,975 and the annual was £751,572.
In everyday language: An earmark is an internal promise about future use. It is not the same as cash sitting untouched in its own bank account.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2021 — Electoral Commission
Officially confirmed Murrell's loan is reported to the late
The Electoral Commission was told the lender's identity in August 2022 and published the record on 2 September. The original loan and repayments should have been reported in the relevant 2021 quarters.
In everyday language: Late reporting is a regulatory failure. The Commission's correspondence records guidance; it does not establish that a fine was imposed.
Sources
- Loan record AL0559123 — Electoral Commission
- FOI 002-23 — report of SNP loan — Electoral Commission
Reported at the time Johnston Carmichael tells the SNP it will stop auditing the party
The firm gave notice months before the 2023 police searches. The SNP later said the decision followed a review of the firm's client portfolio and resources. The departure did not become public until April 2023.
In everyday language: No cited source says the found fraud or left because of a police raid. The timing rules out saying the April 2023 raid caused the departure.
Source
Established in court The admitted course of ends
The public court narrative gives October 2022 as the end of Murrell's offending. By then it had run for more than 12 years.
Source
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed The Supreme Court blocks Holyrood's proposed referendum route
The court unanimously ruled that the Scottish Parliament could not legislate for the proposed referendum without Westminster authorisation. The intended October 2023 vote could not proceed by that route.
In everyday language: This explains why the purpose named in the appeals remained politically unresolved. It does not decide whether the SNP's accounting treatment matched what donors expected.
Source
- Reference on a proposed Scottish independence referendum bill — UK Supreme Court
Reported at the time The Murrell loan becomes a major public story
The SNP said Murrell had personally contributed money to help after the 2021 election. The named Electoral Commission loan record had already been published in September, but broad public attention arrived in December.
Sources
- Loan record AL0559123 — Electoral Commission
- What is the latest in the SNP finance probe? — STV News
2023 · arrests, searches and public scrutiny
Context — not evidence of guilt Sturgeon announces that she will step down
Sturgeon said she would resign as First Minister and SNP leader once a successor was chosen. No official evidence establishes that Operation Branchform caused her decision.
Source
- First Minister to resign — Scottish Government
Context — not evidence of guilt A separate membership-number row erupts
The SNP said 72,186 members could vote in its leadership contest, down from 103,884 reported at the end of 2021. Communications chief Murray Foote resigned after the party's earlier public response was shown to be inaccurate.
In everyday language: This was a party-governance controversy, not a police or court finding about money.
Source
Context — not evidence of guilt Murrell resigns as SNP chief executive
Murrell accepted responsibility for the party's response to the membership figures and resigned after more than two decades as chief executive. His statement was not an admission about the finance investigation.
Source
- Peter Murrell resigns as SNP chief executive — STV News
Officially confirmed authorise applications for search and warrants
Police sent draft applications to on 20 March. instructed to apply, and a sheriff granted the warrants on 3 April. Additional orders later obtained evidence from banks, retailers, and accountants.
In everyday language: A sheriff-approved gives police legal authority to search or . It is not a verdict.
Source
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed Murrell is ; home, headquarters and the motorhome are searched
Police Murrell at 07:45 and searched the home he shared with Sturgeon, SNP headquarters and the motorhome at his mother's driveway. He was released at 18:57 without charge pending further investigation.
In everyday language: The seizure did not itself prove how the motorhome had been bought. Its purchase with party money was established later through Murrell's and the agreed court narrative.
Sources
- SNP funding and finances — man arrested — Police Scotland
- SNP funding and finances — arrest update — Police Scotland
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Reported at the time The SNP reveals that its left months earlier
It became public that Johnston Carmichael would not audit the next accounts. New First Minister Humza Yousaf said he had learned this only after becoming leader. The firm had notified the party in 2022, before the searches.
Source
Officially confirmed The SNP starts an internal governance review
The party's national executive created a Governance and Transparency Review Group to examine governance and financial oversight. It was an internal party process, not an independent police, court or inquiry.
Source
Officially confirmed Treasurer Colin Beattie is , released, then resigns the role
Police Beattie as a suspect and released him later that day without charge pending further investigation. He resigned as SNP national treasurer the following day.
In everyday language: Beattie was never . Police formally ended their investigation of him in March 2025.
Sources
- SNP funding and finances — second man arrested — Police Scotland
- Operation Branchform update — Police Scotland
Officially confirmed AMS Accountants Group becomes the replacement
The SNP appointed AMS to audit both the central party and Westminster group accounts as filing deadlines approached. An appointment is not an audit conclusion or a finding about the police case.
Source
- SNP appoints AMS Accountants Group — Sky News
Officially confirmed Sturgeon is and released without charge
Sturgeon attended by arrangement, was as a suspect at 10:09 and was released at 17:24 without charge pending further investigation. She said afterwards that she had done nothing wrong.
In everyday language: At this point she was not cleared: inquiries could continue. That changed in March 2025, when police said she was no longer under investigation.
Sources
- SNP funding and finances — 11 June update — Police Scotland
- Nicola Sturgeon released without charge after arrest — The Independent / PA Media
Officially confirmed The 2022 accounts receive a and are filed
AMS could not obtain original documentation for some cash and cheque receipts involving membership, donations and raffle income. The Electoral Commission received the accounts by the July deadline.
In everyday language: A qualification means the lacked enough evidence for a defined area. It is not automatically a finding of theft, false accounting or .
Sources
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2022 — Electoral Commission
- SNP accounts to carry qualification over missing documentation — Sky News
- SNP files annual accounts with Electoral Commission — STV News
Officially confirmed Published accounts show an £804,278 and £46,766 cash
The 2022 accounts reported £4.25 million income, £5.05 million expenditure, of £219,629 and £46,766 cash. Publication made the submitted numbers public; it did not mean the had verified every figure.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2022 — Electoral Commission
2024 · one charge and two unresolved investigations
at that stage Murrell is rearrested and police charge him in connection with
Police rearrested Murrell at 09:13, questioned him and him at 18:35 in connection with of SNP funds. He was released and the evidence was prepared for .
In everyday language: A police charge is a formal . It was not yet a or even a prosecutor's decision to take the case to court.
Source
- SNP finances — man charged — Police Scotland
Officially confirmed Police submit the Murrell
Police passed a standard containing one charge, then covering alleged conduct from 2016 to 2023. began its independent evidence and public-interest assessment.
In everyday language: Later examination traced the proved offending back to 2010 and narrowed the final amount. Earlier dates and totals remained allegations until the plea was agreed.
Sources
- Operation Branchform report submitted to COPFS — Police Scotland
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed Police ask for advice about Sturgeon and Beattie
Police submitted an advice-and-guidance request, including whether more inquiries were needed. It was not a and neither person had been .
In everyday language: The distinction matters: police did not submit either Sturgeon or Beattie for .
Sources
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- FOI 26-1903 — Branchform advice and guidance submission — Police Scotland
Officially confirmed Police say the Sturgeon and Beattie investigations remain live
Chief Constable Jo Farrell confirmed that the inquiries concerning Sturgeon and Beattie were still ongoing and gave no completion date. This was the accurate public position at the time.
Sources
- Operation Branchform: key dates in the SNP finance investigation — STV News
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed The 2023 accounts show a , with an audit limitation repeated
The accounts reported £4.75 million income, a £661,568 , £441,939 and £42,448 cash. The again lacked documentation for some cash and cheque receipts from before July 2023.
Source
- Scottish National Party annual report and financial statements 2023 — Electoral Commission
2025 · charging decisions are made
Context — not evidence of guilt Sturgeon announces that she and Murrell have separated
Sturgeon said the couple had separated some time earlier and were ending their marriage. This is personal context only; no causal connection to a charging decision or the facts of the offence is asserted.
Source
Context — not evidence of guilt Sturgeon says she will not stand at the 2026 Holyrood election
The announcement marked the approaching end of her parliamentary career. It is not evidence about the finance case, and this timeline does not claim the investigation caused it.
Source
- Sturgeon will not seek re-election — STV News
Officially confirmed Police end the Sturgeon and Beattie investigations without charge
Police Scotland said Nicola Sturgeon and Colin Beattie had not been and were no longer under investigation. Scotland's service later said senior found no charge or further inquiry was required, and a second independent senior lawyer agreed.
In everyday language: For Operation Branchform, this is the present legal status. A separate July 2026 complaint about Yes Scotland's finances does not publicly name Sturgeon as a suspect.
Sources
- Operation Branchform update — Police Scotland
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
at that stage Murrell attends his first private court hearing
Murrell made no plea and was released on bail while the serious criminal case continued. The at this early stage was described as more than £460,000.
In everyday language: This was the first private court hearing in a serious criminal case. No plea was taken, and were allowed to keep preparing the case. The amount later proved was £400,310.65.
Sources
- Lord Advocate case updates — released correspondence — Scottish Government
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
2026 · guilty plea, proof and sentence
at that stage serve a High Court
The alleged that Murrell had £459,046.49. That figure was still an : and the defence later agreed a narrower proved total and an earlier start date.
Sources
- Lord Advocate case updates — released correspondence — Scottish Government
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed A 318-page statement of agreed evidence is served
served a Statement of Uncontroversial Evidence and draft schedules running to 118 pages and more than 1,000 purchases. This reduced what would have needed to be proved by witnesses at a trial.
Sources
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Officially confirmed The preliminary hearing is moved to 25 May
The Crown and defence jointly asked for more preparation time because of the volume of material and the defence's position. A High Court judge granted the application.
In everyday language: The official record gives an ordinary case-preparation reason. It provides no basis for claims that the date was moved for political advantage.
Source
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court Murrell instructs his lawyers to explore a
This was not public at the time. disclosed after sentencing that Murrell's lawyers began discussions in March and formally confirmed on 21 May that he would plead guilty.
Source
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Established in court Murrell pleads guilty to one charge of
At the High Court in Edinburgh, Murrell admitted embezzling £400,310.65 from the SNP between August 2010 and October 2022. He was in custody for sentence.
In everyday language: This is the definitive criminal finding. Police never reported anyone for fraud, so describe the as —not fraud.
Sources
- Statement following conviction of Peter Murrell — Police Scotland
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Reported at the time Sturgeon says she did not know about the crimes
Sturgeon said Murrell had betrayed her trust, denied knowing about his offending and said she was not responsible for it. This is her attributed account; the established legal fact is that she was not and no longer under investigation.
Sources
- Sturgeon rejects blame for former husband's embezzlement — Associated Press
- Operation Branchform update — Police Scotland
Established in court The full agreed account is read in court
The public finally receives the detailed, admitted story: hundreds of personal purchases, false expense claims and invoices, a Volkswagen, a Jaguar and the £124,550 motorhome. The total proved is £400,310.65.
In everyday language: warned that investigative material left out of this agreement was not proved and must not be treated as fact. The court record does not identify unnamed recipients or make Sturgeon responsible for omitted purchases.
Sources
- Peter Murrell agreed narrative — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- Peter Murrell prosecution briefing — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
Still ongoing The SNP says it is seeking recovery of the stolen money
The party executive reportedly authorised civil recovery action. John Swinney later told Parliament that, as the SNP's principal trustee, he had acted to seek return of the money.
In everyday language: Action to recover money is not the same as successful repayment. No cited source says the full loss has yet been returned.
Sources
- SNP move to claim back stolen money — ITV News
- Meeting of the Parliament — 11 June 2026 — Scottish Parliament
Officially confirmed Holyrood backs a broader independent review of party finance
An original Labour proposed a parliamentary inquiry specifically into Branchform and Murrell's . An amendment replaced that with an independently led review covering all political parties. The amended passed 71–50.
In everyday language: It is incomplete to say simply that Parliament either approved or rejected a Branchform inquiry: the wording was changed before the final vote.
Source
- Motion S7M-00294 — Peter Murrell prosecution — Scottish Parliament
Established in court Murrell is sentenced to five years and three months
Lord Young set a seven-year sentence, then reduced it for the early and backdated it to 25 May. The judge described prolonged, calculated dishonesty and a serious breach of trust, while also recording remorse and a low risk of reoffending.
Source
- HMA v Peter Murrell — sentencing statement — Judiciary of Scotland
After sentence · the parts that remain live
Still ongoing The ends, but asset and property work continues
Scotland's service said the criminal case had concluded. Separate court action would try to recover money gained through the crime and decide what happened to seized property. Police confirmed that this work remained unfinished.
In everyday language: That is why this page does not say every part of Operation Branchform is closed.
Sources
- Prosecution statement following sentencing of Peter Murrell — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- Sentencing of Peter Murrell — Police Scotland
Still ongoing The Electoral Commission reviews earlier SNP filings
The Commission said it was reviewing past accounts, declarations and disclosures after the . It also said its annual checks found no evidence that £2,248,353 in public grants for party policy research and development had been misused.
In everyday language: A review is not a finding of wrongdoing. The public-grant checks and the wider post- account review are two different things.
Source
- Electoral Commission letter to the Scottish Affairs Committee — UK Parliament
Officially confirmed A Commons committee explores joint with Holyrood
The Scottish Affairs Committee wrote to Scottish Parliament committees about possible joint work. Its announcement did not itself open a formal inquiry.
Source
- Scottish Affairs Committee writes to Holyrood committees — UK Parliament
Still ongoing Police make inquiries into a separate Yes Scotland complaint
Police confirmed that they had received a complaint alleging that just over £1.5 million in Yes Scotland income was unaccounted for. Yes Scotland denied money was missing and later provided its accounts to police.
In everyday language: This is separate from Operation Branchform. As at 2 August, police had not publicly named Sturgeon—or anyone else—as a suspect, and no wrongdoing had been established.
Sources
- Police make inquiries over Yes Scotland complaint — STV News / PA Media
- Yes Scotland hands accounts to police after complaint — The Independent / PA Media
- Yes Scotland Limited filing history — Companies House
Officially confirmed Police release narrow records about warrants and the advice request
Police said they had sought no court orders compelling the SNP itself to provide financial information. A separate response confirmed the August 2024 advice request but withheld it and said the Crown held the 542-page review.
In everyday language: These disclosures answer limited questions. They do not prove broad claims that the party either fully co-operated with or obstructed every part of the inquiry.
Sources
- FOI 26-1508 — Branchform court orders to the SNP — Police Scotland
- FOI 26-1903 — Branchform advice and guidance submission — Police Scotland
Still ongoing The latest verified position
Murrell is serving a five-year-three-month sentence. Sturgeon and Beattie were not and are no longer under investigation in Operation Branchform. Asset recovery, the Electoral Commission review and police inquiries into the separate Yes Scotland complaint remain unfinished.
In everyday language: This page will change when an official source changes that position—not simply when a new or anonymous claim appears.
Sources
- HMA v Peter Murrell — sentencing statement — Judiciary of Scotland
- Operation Branchform update — Police Scotland
- Prosecution statement following sentencing of Peter Murrell — Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
- Electoral Commission letter to the Scottish Affairs Committee — UK Parliament
- Police make inquiries over Yes Scotland complaint — STV News / PA Media
What the court actually proved
£400,310.65
taken from the SNP by Peter Murrell
One charge of · August 2010 to October 2022
Murrell was trusted to operate the party's main account and approve spending. He used that legitimate access for an illegitimate purpose. Staff whose cards were also used did not know. False descriptions made purchases look like event merchandise, legal costs, computer equipment, assets or other party work.

£400,310.65
total
12+ years
August 2010 to October 2022
383
unauthorised Amazon purchases
238
other unauthorised retailer purchases
The biggest proved transactions
- A £124,550 motorhome, paid for from the party account, hidden behind a false vehicle invoice and kept at Murrell's mother's home. It was insured for Murrell's private use and had four miles on the odometer when seized.
- £57,500 of party money towards a Jaguar i-Pace. When it was sold, £47,378.76 went into Murrell's personal account.
- £16,489 towards a Volkswagen Golf that was Murrell's personal car, not an SNP asset.
- £18,408.91 in false expense claims, supported by fabricated or altered invoices.
- Hundreds of purchases including watches, stationery, coffee equipment, cookware, electronics, gardening equipment and household goods.
The detailed purchase list can make the story feel sensational. The legal centre is simpler: a person in control of an organisation's money repeatedly used it without authority and disguised the transactions. Lord Young called it calculated dishonesty and a serious breach of trust.
What was not proved
Scotland's service explicitly warned that material omitted from the agreed narrative was not proved. The public record does not name people described only as receiving items “for others”. It is therefore unsafe to guess who received an item, to attribute an omitted purchase to Sturgeon, or to turn an investigative claim into a court finding.
How the investigation became a court case
Complaints
Questions about referendum donations reached Police Scotland from March 2021.
Formal inquiry
Police opened the investigation in July 2021 and followed the money beyond the original complaints.
Warrants and arrests
A sheriff approved warrants in April 2023. Police searched addresses, seized material and Murrell, Beattie and Sturgeon at different times.
Different routes
Murrell was . Sturgeon and Beattie were not reported for ; police instead asked for advice about whether more inquiry was needed.
Independent review
assessed 516 witness statements, tens of thousands of files and a 542-page report. A second independent senior lawyer checked the key decisions and agreed.
Plea and sentence
Murrell pleaded guilty in May 2026. The agreed facts were read in June and he was sentenced later that month.
Why the legal word is embezzlement, not fraud
Police did not report anyone for for fraud. describes a person who lawfully has access to someone else's money, then dishonestly converts it for an unauthorised use. Calling this a “fraud ” sounds close in everyday speech, but it is not the offence Murrell admitted.
What is still live now
The guilt and sentence part of Murrell's case is complete. Three connected but distinct processes were unfinished at the latest check.
- Recovery: court action continues to recover money gained through the crime and decide what happens to seized property. The SNP has also said it is seeking the return of its loss. Neither statement means the full amount has already been recovered.
- Electoral Commission: the is reviewing earlier accounts, declarations and disclosures after the . A review is not a finding.
- Yes Scotland:police are making inquiries after a separate complaint about the 2014 campaign organisation's finances. Yes Scotland denies that money is missing and supplied accounts. Police have not publicly named Sturgeon or anyone else as a suspect in that matter.
Parliamentary bodies are also discussing broader of political-party finance. Holyrood voted for an independently led, all-party review, while the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee approached Holyrood committees about possible joint work. Neither announcement should be described as a completed inquiry.
Bookmark this living record
Bookmark this page with ⌘D on a Mac or Ctrl+D on Windows. Updates will also be posted on Scotland Counted on X. The email list sends a short note when the evidence changes.
Follow the evidence
One email when this timeline changes
No daily political newsletter. Just an update when a court, police, prosecutor, regulator or official inquiry changes the verified position.
How updates and corrections work
A new claim is not added as fact merely because it is dramatic or widely repeated. Before an update, the court position, contempt restrictions and the best available primary record are checked. If only reporting is available, the event is attributed and labelled that way. If the public status changes, the four status cards at the top change first.
Material corrections are dated in the site's corrections log. Quiet copy edits do not rewrite the history: the article date records when the evidence was last checked.

