Holding the council to account · Checked 2026-08-02
Falkirk: what was promised and what happened
Falkirk may need to find £62m. The review warned that one-off savings will not last, and that services could suffer without deeper change. Just over half of people are happy with how clean the streets are. Nearly a third of its main roads need repair.
What this means
Falkirk said it needed £14.5m more than it expected to get this year. Nearly every council in Scotland said the same thing. On the measures every council reports the same way, it is worse than the Scottish average on 2 of 6. Independent auditors have 1 warning about it that is still open. Every figure below links to the official paper it came from.
Words with a dotted underline have a quick explanation. Hover or tap them.
The headline
Three things to know
If you only read one part, read this. The detailed figures and official source links come after it.
Nearly every council says this every year. It is a plan, not money missing from the bank. The law says they cannot plan to spend more than they get. So the gap always gets closed. Usually that is partly your council tax.
Worse than the Scotland average
2 of 6
measures compared
Every council reports these the same way, so it is a fair comparison. The other 4 are better than average.
Watchdog warnings still open
1
not signed off
Independent auditors raised these and they are not closed yet. They do not work for the council.
Follow the money
What the published figures say
These figures show what the council planned to spend on everyday services and what it still needed to find. That second number is not money already missing. The final accounts show what really happened after the year ended. A pays for everyday services. A pays for big, long-term things.
Money for everyday council services
£508.4m
2026/27
Falkirk planned to spend £508.4m on everyday services in 2026/27. This is a plan, not the final amount spent.
Extra money needed for services
£14.5m
2026/27
When the budget was set, Falkirk needed £14.5m more to pay for planned services. The council planned to find it through savings, extra income, money already set aside or other changes. It is not money already missing from a bank account.
Savings the council planned to make
£10.2m
2026/27
The 2026/27 plan says the council will save £10.2m. That money has not necessarily been saved yet. The final accounts will show whether it happened.
Money the budget does not explain
£7.1m
2026/27
The budget puts £7.1m into a box called ‘other measures’. This can include council tax, extra income, money already set aside or other actions. The published table does not show how much comes from each one.
Scottish Government money listed for the council
£381m
2025/26
For context, the Scottish Government lists £381m as Falkirk's share of national council funding for 2025/26. It is not proof of what the council finally spent.
Councils say they need more money nearly every year, whatever they are given. Here is what that really means, and who ends up paying for it.
31 of Scotland’s 32 councils said they needed more money this year.
Only South Lanarkshire said it had money left over. Falkirk said it needed £14.5m more.
The money from the Scottish Government went up that year, not down. Councils got £15.7bn. That is up 2% on the year before, even after prices rose. And the amount they say they are short has stayed about the same for seven years running. It works out at about 3p in every pound they spend.
So what is a “budget gap”?
Before a council sets its budget, it works out two numbers. What it thinks its services will cost. And what money it thinks it will get.
If the cost is bigger, the difference is the gap. It is a plan, made before any decisions. It is not money missing from a bank account.
The law says a council cannot plan to spend more than it gets. So the gap always gets closed. It has to be. The real question is who pays to close it.
Who paid to close it
This is every council added together, for 2026/27.
Council tax went up£221m
35.2%
Savings that repeat every year£168m
26.8%
Money taken out of the savings pot£122m
19.4%
Other one-off actions
8.5%
Other repeating actions
5.4%
Higher fees and charges£17m
2.7%
One-off savings£12m
1.8%
The biggest single way the gap was closed was your council tax. £221m of it. Every council in Scotland put its rate up. The average rise was 7.7%. It ran from 4% in City of Edinburgh to 10% in Aberdeenshire and Moray. That was the second year in a row. Over the two years together, bills went up 18% on average.
Do they lose money if they spend less?
A lot of people assume a council has to spend the lot, or it gets less next year. That is not how the grant works.
The Scottish Government works out each council’s share using a formula. It counts things the council cannot change:
•How many people live in the area
•How many children are at school
•How poor the area is
•How far apart people live, and how many miles of road there are
It does not count how well the council managed last year’s money. A council that comes in on budget does not get less the next year for doing it.
Where every £1 comes from
60pA grant from the Scottish Government
20pCouncil tax
18pBusiness rates, paid by shops and offices
2pMoney set aside, and other income
Council tax is only about a fifth of the money. So putting it up does not raise much next to the whole budget. But it comes straight out of your pocket.
Those are the facts. What you make of them is up to you.
Councils work out and describe their budget gap in different ways, so these figures are not a perfect like-for-like comparison. Audit Scotland says comparisons should be made with caution. Figures from Local government budgets 2026/27, Audit Scotland, for the Accounts Commission, June 2026. How the formula works is set out by SPICe, the Scottish Parliament's research service.
The missing evidence
What we still do not know about services
A goal is what the council said it wanted to achieve. The result is what happened. They sit side by side here, and it is flagged when the two numbers cannot be compared fairly.
Red means a goal was missed or a matter is still open. Green means a goal was met or the action is marked complete. Grey means there is not enough evidence for a firm result.
Council finance
Can we check what the council actually spent?
Needs new evidence
Goal
A like-for-like result for each service
What happened
The final spending figures for each service have not been added yet.
Period: 2025/26 final spending and 2026/27 plan
This is a missing check, not proof that the council met or missed a goal. The next update should compare the plan with what was actually spent in each service.
In 2025/26, Falkirk awarded a Crisis Grant in 68% of decided applications. Scotland's rate was 65%. The same national scheme produced council rates from 52% to 89%.
Decisions resulting in an award
68%
About 3,625 awards from 5,360 decisions.
Compared with Scotland
+3 points
Rank #11 of 32 when published award rates are ordered highest to lowest.
Decided by the deadline
95%
By the end of the next working day, January to March 2026.
Average award
£135
£487,029 in Crisis Grant expenditure during 2025/26.
Five complete years
This is not just one quarter
Share of decisions resulting in an award
2021/22Falkirk 48% · Scotland 66%
2022/23Falkirk 51% · Scotland 63%
2023/24Falkirk 44% · Scotland 62%
2024/25Falkirk 59% · Scotland 63%
2025/26Falkirk 68% · Scotland 65%
These are applications and decisions, not unique people. A person can apply more than once. Counts are rounded to the nearest five and can differ slightly when added.
The question this council needs to answer
Falkirk's published award rate is 3 percentage points above Scotland. That does not remove the need for scrutiny: the council should still publish enough information to show how decisions are made consistently and whether rejected applicants can use the review process.
A higher rate is not automatically better and a lower rate is not proof of unlawful or ruthless decision-making. The figures prove different outcomes. They do not establish motive, applicant need or decision quality on their own.
Every council in Scotland reports these figures the same way, so this is a fair comparison. The year is shown for each figure.
Main roads needing repair
The share of the council's A-class roads flagged for repair.
10th worst in Scotland
Here: 32.2% · Scotland: 30.3% · 2025/26 · 1.9 percentage points more than the Scotland figure
Cost of bin collection, per property
What the council spends collecting bins, per property, each year.
7th lowest in Scotland
Here: £54.56 · Scotland: £77.26 · 2024/25 · £23 less than the Scotland figure
Council tax actually collected
How much of the year's council tax came in on time.
10th best in Scotland
Here: 96.5% · Scotland: 95.5% · 2024/25 · 1.0 percentage points more than the Scotland figure
Cost per primary school pupil
What the council spends on each primary pupil in a year.
12th lowest spend of 32
Here: £7,447 · Scotland: £7,606 · 2024/25 · £158 less than the Scotland figure
Lower is not better here. It means less money spent on each child, which can mean good value or it can mean less help in the classroom. This one is not scored.
Sick days per staff member
Average days lost to sickness per council worker, not counting teachers.
10th best in Scotland
Here: 13.4 days · Scotland: 14.5 days · 2024/25 · 1.1 days less than the Scotland figure
Household waste recycled
The share of household waste that gets recycled.
10th best in Scotland
Here: 51.5% · Scotland: 44.3% · 2024/25 · 7.2 percentage points more than the Scotland figure
Happy with street cleaning
The share of adults happy with how clean the streets are.
8th worst in Scotland
Here: 52.3% · Scotland: 57.0% · 2024/25 · 4.7 percentage points less than the Scotland figure
Figures from the Local Government Benchmarking Framework, published by the Improvement Service, the national comparison every council takes part in. Data file retrieved 2026-08-03. Check the data yourself.
Councils like yours
How Falkirk compares with similar councils
Comparing a big city with a small island council is not fair on either. So the Improvement Service, which runs the national benchmarking, sorts all 32 councils into groups of eight and publishes an average for each group. The grouping and every average below are theirs, not mine. Bin, road and recycling measures are grouped by how urban or rural an area is. Collection and satisfaction measures are grouped by deprivation.
For services shaped by geography, such as bins, roads and recycling
The share of the council's A-class roads flagged for repair.
2025-26
Falkirk
32.2%
Similar councils
26.6%
Scotland
30.3%
In 2010-11, the first year published, the figure here was 26.9%. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
What the council spends collecting bins, per property, each year.
2024-25
Falkirk
£54.56
Similar councils
£69.81
Scotland
£77.26
In 2012-13, the first year published, the figure here was £99.09. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
How much of the year's council tax came in on time.
2024-25
Falkirk
96.5%
Similar councils
96.1%
Scotland
95.5%
In 2010-11, the first year published, the figure here was 96.1%. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
What the council spends on each primary pupil in a year.
2024-25
Falkirk
£7,447
Similar councils
£7,458
Scotland
£7,606
In 2010-11, the first year published, the figure here was £6,693. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
Lower is not better here. It means less money spent on each child, which can mean good value or it can mean less help in the classroom. This one is not scored.
Average days lost to sickness per council worker, not counting teachers.
2024-25
Falkirk
13.4 days
Similar councils
14.7 days
Scotland
14.5 days
In 2010-11, the first year published, the figure here was 10.7 days. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
The share of household waste that gets recycled.
2024-25
Falkirk
51.5%
Similar councils
42.3%
Scotland
44.3%
In 2010-11, the first year published, the figure here was 49.3%. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
The share of adults happy with how clean the streets are.
2024-25
Falkirk
52.3%
Similar councils
54.7%
Scotland
57.0%
In 2013-14, the first year published, the figure here was 73.1%. Figures are adjusted for inflation by the publisher, so the two years can be compared.
Groups and averages from the Local Government Benchmarking Framework, Improvement Service. “Similar councils” is the average for the group of eight that includes Falkirk, on the set of councils the publisher uses for that measure.
Outside checks
What the auditors found
These are checks by people outside the council: Audit Scotland, the Accounts Commission and the Scottish Housing Regulator. An is a point they recorded after checking the books or how a service works. is the formal name for one of those checks. It is not a gold star for every service.
Audit Scotland / Accounts Commission · 2024-05-02
Falkirk faces a £62m gap despite improvement
In progress
The review says Falkirk may need to find £62m and warned that one-off savings will not last. It called for urgent service changes, while noting that performance reporting was strong but some services were falling behind.
What was recommended: The council should show a lasting way to solve the money problem and publish action for services that are below their goals.
A is something the council said it would do. We look for a date, an owner and later proof. Saying it in a plan is not the same as finishing it.
No council commitment with a published deadline has been added to this record yet.
What we still do not know
This is a first, source-complete record, not a claim that every council decision is covered. These gaps stay visible so the page cannot pretend to know more than the evidence supports.
The £62m figure is a from the 2024 review and needs a fresh budget update.
The current list of underperforming services and recovery actions is not yet extracted.
Savings delivery and service outcomes need to be tracked together.
The publication containing the council finance results and 2026/27 budget estimates. Service-by-service comparisons have not yet been extracted into these records.
The estimated money problem, warning about one-off savings, and comments about performance reporting and underperforming areas.
Council officers and elected members can send corrections or a response through the contact page. Confirmed changes will be dated and recorded here.
Straight answers
Questions people ask
01
How much money does Falkirk receive?
Falkirk has £508.4m listed under Money for everyday council services for 2026/27. It is a budget or , not proof of the final amount spent, and the other figures on this page are kept separate.
02
Has Falkirk missed any goals?
No service-goal result has been checked for this record yet.
03
What percentage of Crisis Grant applications does Falkirk award?
In 2025/26, 68% of decided Crisis Grant applications in Falkirk resulted in an award, compared with 65% across Scotland. This is an rate for applications, not unique people, and it does not by itself explain why councils differ.
04
Does this page prove that a councillor is personally responsible?
No. It records what the council, its officers, auditors and regulators published. It does not assign an individual motive or blame without a separate documented decision trail.
See the poverty figures alongside this record
The Falkirk area page shows the local poverty, work and pay figures that explain why council decisions matter.
Councils publish new figures every year, and almost nobody hears about it. I read the audits and the budget papers when they land, and send one email when the numbers move. A few times a year. Nothing else, ever.